Do people explain why they think only certain strains will be permitted, or why they think the pot consumer will want less biodiversity? Do they plan to vote Y or N on Prop 19?

In the discussions I’ve had, growers who do indoor and outdoor both, have found that certain strains, especially purple ones, are all the rage now. (There is not really a market in CA for outdoor anymore.) The theory is: If pot is grown commercially, then only popular strains will be grown. There is a belief that the commercial THC levels will be codified, much like beer has a set alcohol level.

The vibe I am getting here is mostly N because of the concern in the drop in prices and the disruption to the economy. It’s not just growers but workers, people are employed all year round as caretakers, trimmers and other ganja gigs.

That’s kinda sad — legalization would open the way for them to sell their wares openly and easily. Think value-added products like brownies and such.

Barbara Boxer says No! According to her campaign manager:

“Senator Boxer does not support this initiative because she shares the concerns of police chiefs, sheriffs and other law enforcement officials that this measure could lead to an increase in crime, vehicle accidents and higher costs for local law enforcement agencies.”

Oddly there are many law enforcement officials who support Prop 19. check out JustSayNow.com