Late Night: Fox & Friends Have No Clue About School
Keeping American kids in school longer may not be the best way to improve grades; maybe smaller classes would be a good start, though that idea never crossed the brain pans of the think tank that is Fox & Friends.
No, they were too busy discussing how poor families might benefit from it because children of poor families don’t have parents who can help them to learn. Then Gretchen Carlson pulled a gem out of her blond matter and came up with the idea that if kids stayed in school longer, then there would be negative ramifications on small businesses which provide for kids after school.
Like what, the arcade? Does she mean sports programs like Little League and soccer clubs? Some schools do have after school programs, and there are Boys & Girls Clubs and YMCAs, and various learning programs, but uh…Really, Gretchen?
Keeping kids in school longer hours and for more weeks may not have much impact on how well they learn. But it’s doubtful it will spell the end of small businesses and the Y.
I don’t have kids, but to me it seems logical to have kids at school from like 8 to 5, able to do their homework at school with supervision, tutoring, athletic programs and other resources available. Whether school districts have the money for that is a good question–and where will that money come from?
Education should be a priority–and thank God for Ted Kennedy and school meal programs which helped kids be prepared to study by providing decent meals–but No Child Left Behind didn’t really work out so well, and I wonder if longer school cycles are really the answer to teaching kids to love learning and the importance of an education.





These are just the most tragic national news team ever