All Your Childrens Are Belong to Me!!!!

hypnobama_bb599.thumbnail.jpg

When Newt Gingrich is the GOP’s voice of reason, there’s a whole lot of crazy going on. On the "Today Show" Gingrich said about Obama’s school speech:

President Reagan did it, President George H.W. Bush did it. I read the speech yesterday when it was posted and I think the White House was smart to post it. It’s a good speech. I recommend it to everybody if you have any doubts. I would love to have every child in America read it, think about it, and learn that they should stay in school and they should study.

But I guess what the party animal said wasn’t taken seriously by the radio blowhards.

Here we have Rush Limbaugh comparing Obama to

pot bellied dictator Kim Jong Il

And Lou Dobbs claims Obama is

trying to indoctrinate our kids.

Indoctrinate them to do what exactly? Go to school? Get ahead in the world? 

123 Responses to "All Your Childrens Are Belong to Me!!!!"
Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 07:59 pm 1

ditch skool!


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:07 pm 2

Well of course the Republicans oppose this speech. The absolute last thing they want is a bunch of smart well educated kids. If it spread very widely, that would guarantee that they never win another election ever again.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:09 pm 3

If I kids I’d let Obama watch them before Rush or Lou but alas, I think I might be barren.


RevBev | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:09 pm 4

The utter unkindness and contempt of Rush is a continuing shock to the conscience…..what does it say about us as a people that he continues to have fans and followers. Very discouraging.


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:10 pm 5

hypnobama! hey lisa


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:11 pm 6
In response to ratfood @ 3

Meant to say “IF I had kids.” Where the hell’s the edit?


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:12 pm 7

I was hoping he’d explain who Santa, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy really are!


cinnamonape | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:12 pm 8

Rush making some sort of statement about the girth of anyone else, indicates just how vain and out-of-touch he is. You could fit three Baby Kim’s into Limbaugh’s circus-tent like slacks. There’s some serious psychological repression involved here.


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:13 pm 9

I think this is their theme song. Or maybe this.


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:15 pm 10
In response to cinnamonape @ 8

serious psychological repression

I would say that is the least of Rush’s manifest problems.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:16 pm 11

My children didn’t get the opportunity to hear the POTUS this morning because the f’ing principal of their school decided the entire school would skip it. We weren’t even given the opportunity to opt out. No one was told ahead of time. Why does some old, white, republican asshole get to decide what I’d like my children to see or not? I am pissed that my children missed out.


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:16 pm 12
In response to cinnamonape @ 8

Indeed-Rush has been on a speciai==he wpnt describe it beyond mentioning a couple mea;s here and there


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:16 pm 13
In response to Lisa Derrick @ 7

Then he’d have to tell them what “menage a trois” means and boy-howdy that would get the wingnuts knickers in a twist.


hackworth1 | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:17 pm 14

Indoctrinate them to do what exactly?

Rush, Dobbs, Beck, O’Reilly, Hannity, Boortz, do not want Obama to indoctinate the children of their racist and bigoted fans to accept black Americans as equals.

Racism must be taught. Children do not judge people according to skin color. Adults do and thus teach children to hate.


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:18 pm 15

Well, I know we can count on Rush Limbaugh to know a pot-bellied dictator when he sees one. After all, he looks in that mirror every morning right before he pops his first Oxycontin.


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:18 pm 16
In response to DrDick @ 2

Actually, my Dad has said that the reason the California education system collapsed is that politicians (generally) didn’t want a smart, reasoning electorate.


AZ Matt | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:18 pm 17

Limpballs shouldn’t say much as he is a druggie and has to be a sex tourist.

Dodds’ world is the inside of a TV set.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:19 pm 18
In response to hackworth1 @ 14

Truer words were never said.


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:19 pm 19
In response to ratfood @ 13

Aw, hell, they’ll flip out just at the mention of the words menage a trois. That sounds suspiciously French, you know.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:20 pm 20
In response to EvilDrPuma @ 19

Freedom Fries damit!!!!!


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:21 pm 21
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 16

It’ain’t just California.


AZ Matt | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:21 pm 22
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 16

Republicans think taxes for the public good count only if it is for their good. That is what Prop 13 was.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:22 pm 23
In response to EvilDrPuma @ 19

I dunno, didn’t Bush say the trouble with the French is they have no word for “menage a trois?”


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:23 pm 24
In response to ratfood @ 23

LOL


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:25 pm 25
In response to ratfood @ 21

I suspect it is why we have the lowest per student spending on higher education here in Montana. All that there book larnin’ spoils dem youngins.


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:25 pm 26
In response to ratfood @ 23

Well, we know that at least Jacques Chirac had no word for “the kind of braindead religious fanatic who takes the Book of Revelation as a work of fortune-telling.”


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:25 pm 27
In response to tbsa @ 11

Fuckery. and censorship. and teh stoopid.


constantweader | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:27 pm 28

Hasn’t Gingrich apologized to the Rushbo yet? It’s been hours.

The Constant Weader at RealityChex.com


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:27 pm 29
In response to DrDick @ 25

Home schoolin’ is best, ’specially when they gets to the sex-ed, OOO-WHEEE!


nahant | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:28 pm 30

I say tell them all to go bury their heads in the sand and STFU. These people are all Racist,Time we let the American People just what kind of demented racist people are running the show in the Republican Party. SHIT!!!


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:30 pm 31
In response to EvilDrPuma @ 26

REally. The Talibangelicals seem to base their entire theology on the writings of a couple of guys who never even claimed to have met the Rabbi Yeshua and were seriously hallucinatory. I really do not want to know what St. John the Batshit Crazy was taking, but it makes the brown acid look like a mellow trip. St. Paul the Misogynist ain’t no great shakes neither.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:31 pm 32
In response to marymccurnin @ 27

I wasn’t really happy to have to explain why the principal of their school wouldn’t allow them to watch the address this morning. They actually asked me if the principal hated the President.


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:32 pm 33
In response to tbsa @ 32

Smart kids. What a great teaching moment.


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:32 pm 34
In response to tbsa @ 32

Your children are wise and astute beyond their years. The same cannot be said of their principal.


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:33 pm 35

And, really, what could you say to that except ”Looks like it to me?”


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:34 pm 36
In response to DrDick @ 31

The predictions in Revelations described events which were supposed to happen in the NEAR future. Most of the early Christians who received the text dismissed as rubbish. Unfortunately, it would seem that many of their descendants are not so perceptive.


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:34 pm 37
In response to tbsa @ 32

i would call the principal tomorrow and ask how to answer that question


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:37 pm 38

Thanks, mary and DrDick. They will grow up to be wise progressives too.


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:37 pm 39
In response to Suzanne @ 37

Great idea!


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:38 pm 40
In response to ratfood @ 36

I think we can thank Constantine for that, RF.


klynn | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:39 pm 41
In response to tbsa @ 11

File a FOIA and ask for all emails and any documentation irt POTUS. Then print it.


AZ Matt | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:39 pm 42

From McClatchy: Few students opt out of Obama’s nationwide pep talk

In Florida’s Manatee County, about 150 students didn’t view the speech, out of the county’s 43,000 enrollment. Florida GOP chairman Jim Greer had been one of the chief critics of the speech, until he was able to read a copy of the presentation on Monday and pronounced that he’d have his own children view it.

At Henry Clay High School in Lexington, Ky., 15 of the school’s 2,100 students opted to spend time in the library, the Lexington Herald-Leader reported. The paper quoted Anne Marie Kirk, 17, a senior and president of the Young Republicans at Henry Clay, as saying she liked Obama’s call for individual responsibility.

In Anchorage, where the school superintendent said last week that she’d been deluged with e-mail protests, there were few students who didn’t show up for the speech, which took place at 8 a.m. Anchorage time. In one high school class of 25, only one student opted out. In a grade school class, the count was one out of 49.

The biggest “opt-out” may have taken place in Texas, where the Arlington school district, between Dallas and Fort Worth, refused to show the speech at all. About 100 people gathered at a local Baptist church to watch the speech and to question the district’s plans to bus fifth graders to an event at Dallas Cowboys stadium Sept. 21 that will feature an address by former President Bush.


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:39 pm 43
In response to marymccurnin @ 39

and ask other parents of students there to make similar calls.

the principal took the action and has to bear the consequences of said action.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:40 pm 44
In response to Suzanne @ 37

I absolutely plan on it. I am outraged that an elementary school would play politics in this way. I want to know why the right tards opinion holds more weight than mine? I also want to know why we didn’t have the option of having the children watch or not. One person should NOT decide for the entire school.


TexBetsy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:40 pm 45

Good evening firepups.

My students and I caught the speech in 10 second bursts. Blame the internet (lack of infrastructure) and lack of captioning and/or Spanish translation of the speech. Both are STILL a problem.


Becca | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:41 pm 46

These whackjobs seem to want everybody’s kids to be uneducated, unsophisticated Fox-watching mouth-breathers…

Had to laugh recently when, while watching “Aliens vs Monsters” — in the President’s situation room someone suggests, “Get our top scientific minds on this! Call India!”

After laughing, I sighed and nodded sadly.


kimmy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:41 pm 47

It didn’t sound like L Dobbs.


Loo Hoo. | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:41 pm 48
In response to hackworth1 @ 14

Exactamente.


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:42 pm 49
In response to tbsa @ 44

Ask the school board what patriotic American would deny school children the opportunity to listen to the President of the United States make a speech especially to them.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:43 pm 50
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 40

That had always been my take but I got involved in a discussion about it with someone last year who appeared to have more of the historical record on their side who suggested that Constantine’s role (in regard to inclusion of Revelations in the Bible) was negligible.

I’m afraid I’ve forgotten the details.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:46 pm 51
In response to TexBetsy @ 45

It won’t solve the problem but have a Saucer Size Oatmeal Raisin Cookie anyway.


TexBetsy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:46 pm 52
In response to Lisa Derrick @ 1

Lisa, I know one HS student who walked home at 10:30 this morning (with parental permission) to watch the speech, then went back to school for the afternoon.


PJEvans | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:46 pm 53
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 16

Truth.
They’d all not be reelected.


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:47 pm 54
In response to DrDick @ 49

yup… cause an uproar. create disharmony. pit them against themselves.


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:47 pm 55
In response to ratfood @ 50

It’s always surprised me that Revelation made the cut, since so much of it is anti-Roman screed and the New Testament was assembled after Romans became the “good guys.”


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:47 pm 56
In response to ratfood @ 50

Constantine convened the Council of Nicea, which gave us the Nicene Creed (better for music than the Apostle’s Creed IMO) and chose the canonical texts. I don’t think Constantine himself had a lot to do with the Council — he left it to the sky pilots, as I recall.

So, I’ll blame him for convening the Council and instructing them to select the canonical texts. That ought to be responsibility enough.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:47 pm 57

Lisa !

I think the last Preznut said it best … “Is our children learnin’ ?” … the wingnuts don’t think any more needs to be said.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:48 pm 58

I am going to run with all the above suggestions.


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:50 pm 59
In response to Petrocelli @ 57

Don’t forget, “Are we putting food on our families?”


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:50 pm 60
In response to Petrocelli @ 57

The wingnut response to that question is, “They damn well better not be or there is gonna be hell to pay!”


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:51 pm 61
In response to Petrocelli @ 57

Learning? We don’t need no stinkin’ learnings!


DrDick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:52 pm 62

Think I will make an early night of it. Had a long day today. Take care all.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:52 pm 63

I guess the pukes don’t want the OBGYN’s practicing their “love” with patients either.


Margot | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:53 pm 64
In response to tbsa @ 11

The kids in our local school district missed it too, because the district office got so many nutjob crazies calling, they refused to show it.
A couple miles down the road, another school district allowed it and the kids got interviewed on TV. One little boy said he was going to do his homework right away when he got home, and he wanted to be an orthodontist. A little girl said she would study harder and ask questions if she didn’t understand.


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:55 pm 65

Good night, Dick.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:55 pm 66
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 59

He played the “Village Idjit” part well, while Rome burnt …


TexBetsy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:55 pm 67

Good night Dr. D.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:56 pm 68
In response to Margot @ 64

We watched it online when we got home this evening, but it really burns me up that it wasn’t shown at school. We weren’t even given the option. And then to find out that the principal of the schools in our district were allowed to decide if their school would watch or not. I am going to be the one to stir up some shit now.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:56 pm 69
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 56

What I had always heard was that there was resistance to it’s inclusion but Constantine insisted, believing the scary apocalyptic imagery would be a useful recruitment and management tool. Claiming to be an instrument of God’s will while demonizing one’s opponents… every demagogue’s stock in trade.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:56 pm 70
In response to DrDick @ 62

G’nite Sir !

Is everyone in Cali. safe from the fires ?


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:57 pm 71

Maybe all of the calls received from wingnut parents weren’t from parents at all. Just some phone bank thingie in Utah.


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:57 pm 72

i am a little smoky, but safe, thanks for asking


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:58 pm 73
In response to DrDick @ 62

Nighters.


tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 08:59 pm 74

I guess I am safe in wingnutia, AKA central california.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:00 pm 75
In response to Lisa Derrick @ 72

Lisa, it sounds like your kitteh titled this post. What a remarkably gifted feline.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:01 pm 76
In response to Lisa Derrick @ 72

We’re hearing that 60% of the fires are under control … hope all are safe, including the brave Firefighters.


BargainCountertenor | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:02 pm 77

Good night, pups.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:03 pm 78
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 77

G’nite BCT !


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:03 pm 79
In response to tbsa @ 74

I lived in Modesto in 1985. Hated it. I kept getting notes slipped under my door telling me to find a church home. I found another home in Los Osos.
And the neighbors thought my girls were weird cause they not demur enough.
And there is no an exit sign on the interstate to get to Modesto. Hit or miss.


TexBetsy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:03 pm 80

need help.

need some stats that show that school dropout rates are higher in the south. teen prenancy rates & addiction rates would be good. Anyone have that at their fingertips?


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:03 pm 81
In response to ratfood @ 75

Loved the Obama photo as well …


EvilDrPuma | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:05 pm 82
In response to Petrocelli @ 81

It’s surprising how natural HypnObama looks, isn’t it?


marymccurnin | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:06 pm 83
In response to TexBetsy @ 80

tbsa | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:06 pm 84
In response to TexBetsy @ 80

AZ Matt | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:06 pm 85
In response to TexBetsy @ 80

Go to the Annie E. Casey Foundation and look up Kids Counts. That is their state by state report on children. Or just type Kids Count into google.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:07 pm 86
In response to EvilDrPuma @ 82

Needs a bigger Afro, Daddy-O ! *g*


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:09 pm 87
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 77

G’night BCT.


john.henderson.clark@gmail.com | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:09 pm 88
In response to marymccurnin @ 71

In fact, the piece I read in the Sun on Sunday included a quote from a mom with her kids in private schools. Now what business does she have telling us that our kids can’t hear it? I mean, over the weekend, it was just over the top crazy. Now I live in PG Co, MD. While I do know how Mike Steele voted, just about all the rest of us here went D. That the system had to even make a statement about the whole affair was mind boggling.


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:09 pm 89
In response to ratfood @ 75

Mr Bruce is very talented considering he has no thumbs.


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:10 pm 90
In response to Petrocelli @ 81

That photo has not been altered. All the pictures you see of Obama WITHOUT hypno-eyes are Photoshopped.

Heading out, splendid evening to all.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:11 pm 91
In response to ratfood @ 90

LOL … G’nite ratfood !


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:12 pm 92

*waving g’nite to all the leaving sleepyheads*


ratfood | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:14 pm 93
In response to Lisa Derrick @ 89

Thumbs are overrated and besides, I really don’t think kitties should hitchhike.

On the other hand, they can’t very well drive themselves… very well.


TexBetsy | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:17 pm 94

good night firepups.


pseudonymousinnc | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:21 pm 96

Indoctrinate them to do what exactly? Go to school? Get ahead in the world?

Not hate Mexicans. And other brown people.


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:23 pm 97
In response to TexBetsy @ 94

G’nite Betsy !


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:25 pm 98

pain free sleep tex


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:27 pm 99

sleep is your friend


GregB | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:31 pm 100

Duck Fobbs.

-G


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:34 pm 101
In response to GregB @ 100

You said it, Bro.


Larue | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:39 pm 102

My base!

All my base!

You gots the original, I’m just back home from 6 daze festin.

Thanks Lisa!!!

WOOT!

Now, we get it on, bang a dong, for healthcare reform.

Vacay’s over, done and did.

Time to get it on, and let’s FUCK the mofo’s.

Full care, now, for all. And more.

Fuck the corporatists.

Fuck ‘em all.

Harumph.

;-)


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:43 pm 103
In response to Larue @ 102

Larue !


demi | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:52 pm 104
In response to Petrocelli @ 103

Petro!


Loo Hoo. | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:53 pm 105

Nice Supreme Court shot.


Suzanne | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:57 pm 106
In response to Loo Hoo. @ 105

what’s he doing in the background – some sorta sicilian curse?


demi | Tuesday September 8, 2009 09:57 pm 107
In response to Loo Hoo. @ 105

Yes, it is. Strange little white collar thingie, tho. What is that called? Do you know?


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:00 pm 108
In response to demi @ 104

((( demi )))


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:01 pm 109
In response to Suzanne @ 106

LOL … that’s prolly the secret salute in Opus Dei …


Funnydiva2002 | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:04 pm 110
In response to demi @ 107

it’s a jabot, I think. IIRC, O’Connor wore a lace one. Sotomayor’s looks more like the English version.
They’re lucky: no wigs!

FWDiva


Funnydiva2002 | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:04 pm 111
In response to Petrocelli @ 109

Or warding off the eeeeevil eye. You know the brown folk can’t be trusted.

FWDiva


Petrocelli | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:08 pm 112
In response to Funnydiva2002 @ 111

LOL … FWD !


openhope | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:08 pm 113

Doing a drive-by as I can 40# of peaches. I’m watching the most incredible music show on KCTV[pbs] out of Seattle. An incredible program of international musicians singing for a better way. “Playing For Change” Performing at the Moore Theatre, Weds. Nov. 18th,7:30. They’re doing the fundraiser now . Spendy[ for us] but worth it. $150 for 2 tickets. But these are incredible voices coming from all over the world to “bring people together through the power of music”.
It would be really good to see the phones ringing off the hook.
Okay, off to harvest. I’m doing Elberta peaches,sprig of mint julep, sprinkle of blackberry. This batch.
Next batch …seriously rum-soaked black cherries.
Peace


Lisa Derrick | Tuesday September 8, 2009 10:11 pm 114
In response to ratfood @ 90

His teleprompter is really the one in charge. He is like Mr Lincoln at Disneyland!


Legion303 | Wednesday September 9, 2009 02:21 am 115
In response to tbsa @ 32

“They actually asked me if the principal hated the President.”

My first-grader asked me the same thing, for the same reason (principal not showing the video in school). Kids are more perceptive than we give them credit for sometimes (although in our case it was more because the principal was afraid of pissing off the large percentage of Rush zombie parents).

Go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iqsxCWjCvI for the speech and your kids can see firsthand what’s causing all the controversy: a guy telling kids to work hard, take responsibility and stay in school. You’d think that would resonate with the Ayn Rand Cheerleading Squad, but nope.


DLoerke | Wednesday September 9, 2009 04:10 am 116

I don’t trust Presidents who initially prepare lesson plans telling kids to write letters on how they will support him. While speaking to children may have been done before, propagandizing children is something new. Newt may applaud the President. I don’t.


runfastandwin | Wednesday September 9, 2009 11:17 am 117
In response to tbsa @ 11

You need to write your school board and cc the principal…


DonWilliams | Wednesday September 9, 2009 12:22 pm 118
In response to DLoerke @ 116

Yeah, DL. The people who like to draw lines where there ain’t no lines and put people on the other side refuse to acknowledge that the problem was in the initial Cult of Personality lesson plan. Had Pres. GWBush done the same thing, the people who support Pres. Obama would have gone ballistic.

Let’s face it. Hypocrisy can be entertaining, though ignorance is just sad.


DLoerke | Thursday September 10, 2009 05:36 am 119
In response to DonWilliams @ 118

Ignorance is failing to separate propaganda from fact. The Liar-in-Chief’s propaganda speech last night was no different from his “lesson plan”. The Hypocrisy comes from those on the Left who booed and Hissed President Bush any time he came before the Joint Sessions but try to savage one Congressman for telling the Truth.


twolf1 | Thursday September 10, 2009 07:13 am 120
In response to DLoerke @ 119

Wilson broke the House GOP’s own rules:

Until the 109th Congress, it was not in order to make certain references to the Senate or individual senators. However, at the beginning of that Congress, the House removed the prohibition on making references to the Senate, leaving only the requirement that debate be confined to the question under debate and avoid “personality.” The precedents of the House allow a wide latitude in criticism of the President, other executive officials, and the government itself. However, it is not permissible to use language that is personally offensive to the President, such as referring to him as a “hypocrite” or a “liar.” Similarly, it is not in order to refer to the President as “intellectually dishonest” or an action taken by the President as “cowardly.” References to the Vice President, in spite of his role as President of the Senate, are measured against the standard used for the President rather than prior standards used to govern the Senate.


DLoerke | Thursday September 10, 2009 11:26 am 121
In response to twolf1 @ 120

When the House Rules forbid the telling the Emporer he has no clothes it’s the House Rules that’s the problem–The Emporer is a Liar and He Has No Clothes….


ToddE | Thursday September 10, 2009 12:42 pm 122

Liar in chief?

weapons of mass destruction – would we lie to you?

we don’t torture. Unless we torture, and then we do it because we get vital information. But I can’t tell you what that was, would I lien to you?

I guess the guy who lets you show up at a debate with guns threating revolution is a fascist, but the man who arrests people for wearing a shirt that hurts his feelings is the great defender of liberty.


ToddE | Thursday September 10, 2009 12:47 pm 123

if you would like to tell me your favorite sports team I would be happy to send you a cap lined in aluminum foil so you can resist Obama’s mind ray.


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Get the Most out of FDL

Become a Member today

Local activism projects

Exclusive online chats

Independent media

Close