SAG Awards: Slumdog and Milk–Oscar Foreshadowing?
Stimulating Idea from Nevada’s Brothel Proponents

See Ya, Gramps: Motion Picture Television Fund Offloads Old Folks

chaplin_goldrush_2.jpgAs all of Hollywood gears up for the uber-expensive glitter of the Academy Awards, plus the oh so fancy pre- and post- parties,  100 aging entertainment industry veterans face eviction as the Motion Picture & Television Fund long-term care nursing home and the acute-care hospital close down over the next few months.  The closure will also cost 290 employees their jobs, representing roughly a third of all MPTF’s hourly workers and a third of its managerial staff.

Thursday residents who were able to leave their rooms, some in wheelchairs, joined nurses in scrubs and family members at a union organized rally outside the hospital located in Woodland Hills.  Myra Torres, who works at the facility said:

Many residents have stopped eating. They’re scared in there. They’re scared they won’t have anywhere to go to and that they’re going to be separated from their family and friends.

Anger, frustration and despair was leveled at super-producer Jeffrey Katzenberg, chairman of the Motion Picture & Television Fund Foundation Board, and other board members who decided to close the nursing home and hospital after revealing last week they had lost $10 million annually for the past four years. Um, what no one noticed? Oh wait they undertook 

more than three years of study and analysis by MPTF staff and outside experts 

and came to the conclusion that the oldest, frailest patients had to be cut loose. John Schneider, who played Bo Hazzard on the television series Dukes of Hazzard fumed:

This decision was indeed a fiscal decision made in a vacuum.We didn’t lose the debate. We weren’t even invited to the debate.

Opened in 1948, the facility–known as the Country House with buildings designed by William Pereira–will continue to maintain independent- and assisted-living facilities which house 185 clients and six health care centers, as well as its Harry’s Haven memory care facility, named for Kirk Douglas’ father in recognition of the actor’s support of the MPTF. Additionally the fund provides financial aid, healthcare, health plans, childcare and wellness programs.

Just last year a new $20 million Saban Center For Health And Wellness opened on the facility’s grounds, funded in part with a $10 million donation from Jodie Foster, for whom the therapy pool is named. Yvette Simoneau, whose father–suffering from dementia and Parkinsons disease–has lived in the in the nursing home for five years and will have to leave in April, wondered:

If one person can donate $10 million and that’s how much the fund is losing running the hospital and long-term care facility, then why not give us the chance to raise the money, to find donors to help? A lot of us feel betrayed and feel lied to.

Katzenberg’s original statement citing "declining demand and challenging economic outlook" said in part:

The decision to close the hospital and relocate patients was only reached after a great deal of analysis and discussion. It was determined that this course of action was the only one that would preserve the long-term health and viability of MPTF…The problem is that the vast majority of hospital and LTC patients are covered by government insurance programs whose reimbursement rates have not kept pace with fast-rising operating cost.

A follow-up statement issued to the press carried this cruel gem:

MPTF is a leader in the development and implementation of services and programs for senior citizens. Charity has always remained at the heart of the Motion Picture & Television Fund…

 A job fair for those laid-off in the closures and referrals for the elderly patients to other care facilities are planned. 

The nonprofit fund was founded in 1921 by Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks and D.W. Griffith. To qualify for a place at the Country House, clients must have worked for twenty years in the industry. Fees are based on an ability to pay and covered part or whole by insurance, pension and Medicare.  

The MPTF is supported by donations and investments (some of their individual donors were affected by Bernie Madoff, though that doesn’t offset the $10million a year shortfall annually for the past four years, a hideous hemorrhage). Some families protesting the closure stated their parents and loved ones had donated to the fund anticipating that it–in concert with their own money–would support them in their old age.  Said Schneider:

Many people look forward to coming here, and I’m one of them. They all paid for their rooms in there, and they shouldn’t be forced to move out. There’s still time to do something about this.

In their statement, the board said the LTC facility and acute-care hospital

will be phased out in favor of community-based programs aimed at assisting the growing number of seniors who prefer to “age in place”—that is, live safely and independently in their own homes for as long as possible.

But then what? The people living on MPTF long-term care have lived in their own homes for as long as possible. And what happens when current residents of the independent and assisted living facilities need long term or acute care? Under the new plan, they’ll be moved away from familiar surroundings, away from their friends and staff they have known, and in the words of Schneider, sent to

a frightful death, rather than the peaceful one they envisioned.

 Now comes the big question, if Hollywood can raise millions for political candidates and causes, can it raise money for its own senior citizens? 

  Spotlight
33 Responses to "See Ya, Gramps: Motion Picture Television Fund Offloads Old Folks"
dakine01 | Monday January 26, 2009 05:47 am 1

Welcome to the future.


Leen | Monday January 26, 2009 11:40 am 2

I have spent the last year helping my pops (82)in and out of the nursing home, V.A., assisted living world. Lots of forgotten people in those places, very very sad.

Folks should think about contacting Micheal Moore for media coverage on these places. An easy two episodes of Sicko 2 and Sicko 3. Lots of our elders being whacked. Savings being taken, people in their 80’s getting divorced after 60 years of marriage so the one person needing care is able to access the care they need and the other family member does not have life’s savings whacked

Micheal where are you? Our seniors and these places need the light of day shone on this critical issue

If you are looking for a place to do volunteer work, many of those older folks sure need some loving attention


BooRadley | Monday January 26, 2009 11:41 am 3

digg is open

Thanks Lisa.


Arbusto | Monday January 26, 2009 11:43 am 4

One thing I admired about Hollywood, was that long ago it started taking care of its own bit actors to poor to pay their medical bills. Now with mega actors, directors,producers and movies making billions yearly in theaters and DVD releases, the bank is empty.


SaltinWound | Monday January 26, 2009 11:44 am 5

This is an amazing place. In fact, I’m getting some tests done there today. But the fact they are dropping one hundred patients and TWO HUNDRED NINETY workers shows you the incredible level of care, which is pretty much unsustainable. That is a three to one worker to patient ratio. No one in the country has that. I believe everyone involved has good intentions, but it is a tough situation.


Hugh | Monday January 26, 2009 11:45 am 6
In response to dakine01 @ 1

I could not say it better. Rather than strengthening our social safety net going into hard times we are demolishing it. I have no connection to the entertainment industry or any great liking of it but I see this as symptomatic of the greater problem of the need for social services not just for old entertainers but for the elderly, the poor, the unemployed, and the disempowered.


bonkers | Monday January 26, 2009 11:49 am 7

This common mentality in America to simply discard our sick and frail elderly is just shocking to me. And to think Repubs were trying to take away one of the few safety nets for seniors, by turning Social Securities into Social Insecurity through the stock markets, just recently. Funny how they don’t talk about that now as BigMedia mavens ask Repubs how best to fix our economy.


bonkers | Monday January 26, 2009 11:52 am 8

OT: But this is too wild. The White House record collection contains Captain Beefheart’s Trout Mask Replica. Weird to think a pristine version of that is sitting in there. Hopefully Obama will dust it off and crank it up for inspiration:
http://www.rollingstone.com/ne…..collection

We can thank Jimmy Carter for that and for having the Sex Pistols preserved in the White House as well.


Hugh | Monday January 26, 2009 11:53 am 9

290 to 100 is a ratio of staff to patient loss. But there is no indication that those 290 staff jobs were solely taken up with those 100 patients. Indeed if that were the case they could simply reorganize their staffing along more traditiona lines and keep the 100 patients.


Fern | Monday January 26, 2009 11:53 am 10
In response to SaltinWound @ 5

Good point. I looks like they are in part victims of the quality of care that they provide. Quality care is expensive, especially for the frail and ill elderly.


darkblack | Monday January 26, 2009 11:56 am 11

Katzenberg was a Disney product, so color me unsurprised. Bottom-line thinking at its most flagrant.
If they started losing $10M a year four years ago why did it so long to do something so drastic now?

America eats its young – Hollywood eats its elderly.


darkblack | Monday January 26, 2009 11:59 am 12
In response to bonkers @ 8

I’ll bet it’s never been played past the first 10 seconds of Frownland.

;>)

Probably well stocked with Kenny G and Alan Jackson CDs after the last 8 years, I reckon.


dakine01 | Monday January 26, 2009 12:03 pm 13
In response to SaltinWound @ 5

With all the nursing home horror stories about places being under-staffed and underfunded, we’re now supposed to be upset that there was ONE that actually had enough staffing?

Maybe things should be pushed so that the MPTF Home is the norm rather than the exception.


SaltinWound | Monday January 26, 2009 12:06 pm 14

Hugh, I understand the distinction, but trust me when I say the entire operation has an extremely high level of care. One thing they could do is start charging walk-ins more. Today, I am having lab work done, along with a chest x-ray and doctor appointment, for a grand total of ten dollars.


Twain | Monday January 26, 2009 12:10 pm 15
In response to darkblack @ 12

Don’t knock Kenny G – I use his music to go to sleep to sometimes. Besides elevators would be so dull without him…..oh, wait.


SaltinWound | Monday January 26, 2009 12:10 pm 16

dakine01, who’s going to pay for this? Seniors in our society already have a much better deal, especially in terms of Social Security, than most of us will ever see–including those of us who paid in the most. Should we only take care of the greatest generation, to the exclusion of all others? Why pretend these are simple choices?


behindthefall | Monday January 26, 2009 12:11 pm 17

Nice to see “Jonathan Kent” being active and outspoken. Other than that, the idea of puttng the people least able to help themselves and least likely to have an active, capable familial support system out on the sidewalk is repellent.


dakine01 | Monday January 26, 2009 12:14 pm 18
In response to SaltinWound @ 16

At a time when people are begging for jobs, you don’t think the situation can be modified to allow the support for the “Greatest Generation” as well as providing jobs for other generations? And doing so moving forward? Maybe be getting the insurance companies out of this mess and providing appropriate levels of care so that we don’t see horror stories of seniors left to fester in their own waste in nursing homes?

I’m not saying it’s a simple choice but I’m also wondering why the choice has to be as you are presenting it. It is not an either or situation by any stretch.


Hugh | Monday January 26, 2009 12:17 pm 19
In response to SaltinWound @ 16

Problems in Medicare funding can best be addressed by moving to single payer universal healthcare.


SaltinWound | Monday January 26, 2009 12:19 pm 20

I’ll ask my doctor, who I’m seeing at 2:30, some more about it. But I get the sense people there are torn up about this and trying to find the best homes possible for everyone. No one is being put on the street. But right now these seniors are essentially living at a hospital. No hospital that I’m aware of has a large collection of seniors living there indefinitely.


darkblack | Monday January 26, 2009 12:21 pm 21
In response to Twain @ 15

His music is also useful for keeping rodents out of the victory garden…The high pitched screeching reminds them of their upcoming dental appointments, and thus a sugar beet may live to see another day.

;>)


jackie | Monday January 26, 2009 12:23 pm 22

OT, but funny. Quite possibly the funny complaint letter in a long time.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tra…..etter.html


Twain | Monday January 26, 2009 12:29 pm 23
In response to jackie @ 22

LOL thanks


bonkers | Monday January 26, 2009 12:38 pm 24
In response to darkblack @ 12

In case you haven’t see it, there was a great documentary about Don Van Vliet that someone was kind enough to load on the Tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M5YE_a4B1U

Great way to procrastinate.


puppethead | Monday January 26, 2009 12:46 pm 25

Michael Bay gets unlimited cash to churn out mindless crap filled with unnecessary explosions, while this happens. Shame!


Blub | Monday January 26, 2009 12:47 pm 26

there are pretty consistent reports that a vast amount of professional services companies with “flex” employment arrangements are cutting back hours for salaried employees to bring them below the threshhold required for health coverage (graphics designers, architectural designers, interior designers, the like). It’s getting really ugly out there.

Meanwhile (CNN), 68,000 jobs lost in a day. The final week of January began with a bloodbath for the job market, with more than 68,000 cuts announced today.

Yah economy.


AitchD | Monday January 26, 2009 12:57 pm 27

We didn’t do so great for everyone when our society/economy had only 200 million people, we didn’t plan for this 300-million-people society back then, and now we have the largest cohort – ever – leaving the workforce in retirement, which is just the beginning of a new kind of social emergency. Fortunately, this present cohort (Baby Boomers) are the best-prepared and best equipped to fend and fight on behalf of everyone’s enlightened self-interest.

Many assisted-living facilities are dependent on their residents’ financial portfolios, most of which have lost at least 20% of their wealth forever.

These buildings and beds are also part of our infrastructure, aren’t they?


darkblack | Monday January 26, 2009 01:04 pm 28
In response to bonkers @ 24

An excellent way to procrastinate, Bonkers…Thank you.

;>)


ibfreenow | Monday January 26, 2009 01:38 pm 29

So, let’s get rid of the oldest and sickest!
WTF, none of the MF’ers making millions a picture can kick in a few $100,000 a year? Let see, just a couple of dozen of them spending their mad money to help out these pioneers might be a start.
God curse these rich arrogant pricks withered, frozen souls. I won’t go to another MF’in’ movie if this happens. I won’t watch prime-time TV, or rent DVD’s. Let’s see what happens then!
I say boycott entertainment until the millionaires shell out. Yeah, right, that’ll happen. God forbid people don’t see the latest stupid superhero movie or episode of ‘Lost.”
We, as a society, are LOST!!!


Leen | Monday January 26, 2009 01:43 pm 30
In response to dakine01 @ 18

What many of these folks get paid in these places specifically the aides is pathetic. Just pathetic. This is where the bulk of the work is done. It is from these angels on earth that our seniors get most of their touch, love and care.

Let’s hope Andrew Stern has success in organizing these workers. They deserve to be paid far more for their important work


ibfreenow | Monday January 26, 2009 01:51 pm 31

Soylent Green time anyone?


Lisa Derrick | Monday January 26, 2009 01:56 pm 32

The 290 employees represent 1/3 nursing staff and 1/3 management at both the hospital and the nursing home. What concerns me is that by shuting the long term care facility, the residents of the assisted and independent facilities will no have nowhere for transitioning.

I am very blessed that I was able to find my aunt a wonderful private nursing facility where she lives in a house in a residential neighborhood with 5 other ladies and full time staff–but she has the funds to support that. The flip side are nursing homes which just get by on Medicare funds, that are holding tanks. It is a difficult situation, but to removed people from familiar locations, from staff and friends brings confusion and sadness to the elderly. One woman is 94 years old, another man is 87…

I wish that the consultants and planners for MPTF had more funds at their disposal and perhaps had figured out a way to raise $20 million to keep the facilities going..granted a wellness center is nice, but one day the peopel using it wil be old–and where will they go?


barrygwick57 | Monday January 26, 2009 03:25 pm 33

shame, shame, shame…we have loved our movie heroes and creators…we have paid high prices to see them…and now we are left with the knowledge that Hollywood doesn’t care…shall I rent another video? shall I buy another one? shall I buy a ticket? those who are being thrown into the Soylent soup…I remember. but don’t tell me they’re being thrown away…cut out of the movie heart…and thrown on the cutting room floor…shame, shame, shame.


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
Stimulating Idea from Nevada’s Brothel Proponents
SAG Awards: Slumdog and Milk–Oscar Foreshadowing?

Close