Drop-Outs? Palin’s Corresponding Spins
Someone Tripped Up: So Far No Pics of Tripp 4 $ale

The Griffin Footbullet: Rocket Science at Its Finest

retro_rocket_2.thumbnail.JPGWow, talk about emasculating and meddlesome! This wife makes Dagwood’s Blondie and Bewitched’s Samantha Stevens look laudenum-dosed by their husbands’ work.  On Christmas Eve, Rebecca Griffin sent out an email asking friends to sign a petition going asking that her husband keep his job now that a new boss was coming in:

Folks,
Yes, once again I am embarrassing my husband by reaching out to our friends and "imposing" upon them. Sigh, what’s new? The number 1 fan is a role I have earned, because I know how hard my husband works…
If you are not interested, please delete this email and accept my apologies for bothering you. If you are interested, just log in to the web site shown below. And, if this is inappropriate, I’m sorry.
Merry Christmas, Becky.

Um, eeeuwww, on just so many levels: The faux self-abnigation, the pseudo-sympathy seeking, the manipulation, the utter wrongness on so many levels. Now maybe if her boss was named Ebeneezer and they had a Tiny Tim at home—naw, the three ghosts didn’t need no stinkin’ email or petition.

But Rebecca’s husband’s new boss is PEBO, President-Elect Barack Obama and her husband is NASA Administrator Michael Griffin. The good wife says she

couldn’t think of an easier or better way to let you know about this true "grass roots" endeavor that was set up by former astronauts to encourage the incoming Obama administration to consider keeping Mike Griffin on as NASA Administrator. 

The petition drive was organized by Scott "Doc" Horowitz who has been maintaining the online campaign and eliminating negative comments about Mike that have appeared on the Keep Mike petition. Once a petition like that hits the interwebs, well scientists are very passionate. "Keep Mike" has several hundred people’s signatures, including that of astronaut Mike Fincke who e-mailed his signature from the international space station. 

Horowitz’s petition calls Griffin:

one of the most technically and managerially competent administrators in NASA’s history…true rocket scientist and systems engineer and gifted administrator—is uniquely qualified to take NASA into the next era of space exploration.

Mike has been working hard to keep his GWB appointed gig. He had NASA print and bind at the agency’s expense 2,500 copies of his speeches at a cost of $57,000 and then used priority mail to make sure PEBO got one. No other past adminstrator has done that, and considering NASA, and the country, is sorta cash strapped right now, maybe that wasn’t the best move to impress the P-E.

A few people don’t seem to share Rebecca, Scott and Mike’s view that Mike should keep his job.   The vocal ones  started their their own Remove Mike petition, pointing out that he’s cost the agency and tax papers a lot more than just his vanity press book. The anti-Mike petition has just a few dozen signatures, mostly anonymous with some nasty comments, some criticizing the new space vehicle design.

But most damning are the reports in the Orlando Sentinel of  Griffin’s non-coopertation with Obama’s transition team. He reportedly told Lori Garver, a former NASA associate administrator, that she is “not qualified” to judge his rocket program and then:

a red-faced Griffin demanded to speak directly to Obama, according to four witnesses.

Maybe Former NASA Deputy Administrator Hans Mark, who recommended Griffin to the Bush administration, said Griffin and his friends are handling this wrong:

"Mike ought to play it the way (retained Defense Secretary) Bob Gates is playing it, which is to shut up," Mark said.

  Spotlight
21 Responses to "The Griffin Footbullet: Rocket Science at Its Finest"
newtonusr | Wednesday December 31, 2008 08:16 pm 1

“To the Moon, Alice. To the Moon!”


Teddy Partridge | Wednesday December 31, 2008 08:28 pm 2

Fire Griffin.

And his wife too.

Were taxpayer-funded resources used to send her little missive? Sure like to see Lieberman and Issa investigate the hell outta that!!


bonkers | Wednesday December 31, 2008 10:34 pm 3
In response to newtonusr @ 1

HA!

So strange. Seems like another top shelf Michael-Brownish Shrub appointee. Don’t know about the dude, but his wife is doing a heckuva job.

We definitely know who wears the moonboots in this family though…


mack | Thursday January 1, 2009 06:01 am 4

Cool
The RNC is paying ad revenue to a FDL site.
(with the “Let Illinois vote” ad)


Millineryman | Thursday January 1, 2009 06:24 am 5

Just signed the Remove Mike petition. Thanks.


MrWhy | Thursday January 1, 2009 10:03 am 6

Collins has the job he wants, apparently doing a pretty good job of it, but not happy with the possibility of program cuts. He’s protecting not just his job, but those of many other people. Until I hear something more substantial as to why he should go, I’ll keep my mouth shut and let Obama’s transition team make their decision.


Teddy Partridge | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:18 pm 7

Were any of the “friends” Rebecca Griffin emailed subordinates of her husband? Were any of them direct reports of his? Shouldn’t the House and Senate have hearings on this inappropriate pressure being brought to bear by a family member on behalf of a presidential appointee?

And couldn’t Griffin very easily get a job paying a great deal more as a Star Wars lobbyist?

House Science and Technology Committee:

COMMITTEE MEMBERS in the 110th Congress
BART GORDON (Tennessee), Chairman
Jerry F. Costello, Illinois
Eddie Bernice Johnson, Texas
Lynn C. Woolsey, California
Mark Udall, Colorado
David Wu, Oregon
Brian Baird, Washington
Brad Miller, North Carolina
Vice Chairman Daniel Lipinski, Illinois
Nick Lampson, Texas
Gabrielle Giffords, Arizona
Jerry McNerney, California
Laura Richardson, California
Donna F. Edwards, Maryland
Steven R. Rothman, New Jersey
Jim Matheson, Utah
Mike Ross, Arkansas
Ben Chandler, Kentucky
Russ Carnahan, Missouri
Charlie Melancon, Louisiana
Baron P. Hill, Indiana
Harry E. Mitchell, Arizona
Charles A. Wilson, Ohio
André Carson, Indiana
RALPH M. HALL (Texas), Ranking Republican Member
F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin
Lamar Smith, Texas
Dana Rohrabacher, California
Roscoe G. Bartlett, Maryland
Vernon J. Ehlers, Michigan
Frank D. Lucas, Oklahoma
Judy Biggert, Illinois
W. Todd Akin, Missouri
Tom Feeney, Florida
Randy Neugebauer, Texas
Bob Inglis, South Carolina
David Reichert, Washington
Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
Phil Gingrey, Georgia
Brian P. Bilbray, California
Adrian Smith, Nebraska
Paul Broun, Georgia
(Vacancy)

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee:

Democrats
Chairman Daniel K. Inouye (HI)
John D. Rockefeller, IV (WV)
John F. Kerry (MA)
Byron L. Dorgan (ND)
Barbara Boxer (CA)
Bill Nelson (FL)
Maria Cantwell (WA)
Frank R. Lautenberg (NJ)
Mark Pryor (AR)
Thomas Carper (DE)
Claire McCaskill (MO)
Amy Klobuchar (MN)

GOPs
Ranking Member Kay Bailey Hutchison (TX)
Ted Stevens (AK)
John McCain (AZ)
Olympia J. Snowe (ME)
Gordon H. Smith (OR)
John Ensign (NV)
John E. Sununu (NH)
Jim DeMint (SC)
David Vitter (LA)
John Thune (SD)
Roger Wicker (MS)


SanderO | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:22 pm 8

I am for term limits and this all these idiots would automatically go away. Really this is an idea which we need desparately.

Think of all the idiots we would not have to deal with:

Reid, Pelosi, Corker, McConnell, Greenspan…. remember him? even Norm Coleman and so on and so on and so on.

They can do less damage which far far far outweighs any good some of the others do in second terms. There is plenty of talent capable and willing to serve


BooRadley | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:26 pm 9

Thanks Lisa.

digg


PJEvans | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:26 pm 10

I’d feel a lot more sympathy for Griffin if he hadn’t pulled that stunt with the transition team, treating them almost as if they were peasants begging for an audience with their king.
I’d feel a whole lot more sympathy if he were the only husband and father losing a job this winter. Has he even noticed the economy?


californiarealitycheck | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:29 pm 11

all shrubs appointees should be sacked.


Hugh | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:30 pm 12
In response to newtonusr @ 1

“To the Moon, Alice. To the Moon!”

Hysterical! Best comment of the day.

This is a related item I have from my scandals list.

398. The secrecy and the lack of accountability which have marked the Bush Administration are producing some comical but telling problems for Obama transition teams. NASA’s dictatorial Adminstrator Michael Griffin said that Lori Garver, a former NASA associate administrator, was unqualified to judge his pet project the Constellation program to return astronauts to the moon by 2020. He directed NASA employees to stay on message with the transition team. Interviews were monitored by NASA officials, and employees were told to report conversations back to their managers. Griffin also directly contacted contractors and told them to sell the program and not discuss any alternatives to it. He demanded that they pre-clear their presentations with him. Some contractors were also supplied with talkingpoints saying that if Constellation were cancelled it would make NASA look bad and damage public confidence in it. As a result, some contractors declined to participate in interviews fearing retribution from Griffin.
Griffin’s actions culminated in the following overheard exchange with Garver:

“Mike, I don’t understand what the problem is. We are just trying to look under the hood,” Garver said.
“If you are looking under the hood, then you are calling me a liar,” Griffin replied. “Because it means you don’t trust what I say is under the hood.”

It would be hard to find a more eloquent expression of the Bush mindset of “Trust me and don’t believe your lying eyes” or a better example of the view that facts are not to be addressed but managed.


foothillsmike | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:33 pm 13

IMHO It appears to me that Griffin’s arrogant attitude could be extremely dangerous in the future if there are go no go questions for missions. If he were to disagree with some engineer/scientists who might raise questions how would a decision be made.
451 hrs & 27 min


homas | Thursday January 1, 2009 01:56 pm 14

Dear Rebecca,

The fact that your husband is somewhat of a dick may be the problem. And that’s not rocket science.


bluebutterfly | Thursday January 1, 2009 02:01 pm 15

Funny timing that NASA’s second report on the Columbia disaster just happened to come out at the same time as Griffin’s wife’s plea for mercy. We are witnessing Republican revisionism at work. As the top official, he has some explaining to do. Why, with 30 recommendations for improvements, are men and women still going up in those shuttles? NASA is telling us that the Columbia’s crew died while trying to regain control of their space craft. NASA says that rapid decompression killed them.

The article details how they would have died, anyways, because their space suits are inadequate for survival; their heads would have smashed inside of their helmets. This is the type of competence that the Mrs. thinks he should be rewarded for? He sends astronauts up into space with a maybe you’ll survive, maybe you won’t attitude? He does not care about the lives of astronauts, so why should he be rewarded for not insuring that they, at the very least, have space suits that could give them a chance of survival if they bailed out? Oh..I forgot..the astronauts have not yet been equipped with the parachutes that they require in order to bail out.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl…..asa-report


zapkitty | Thursday January 1, 2009 02:16 pm 16

Griffin seems to have essentially sold his soul to get authorization to build the ship he wanted.

Apparently Griffin just wanted to build a modern day follow-on to the Saturn V and return America to space exploration.

This, in itself, is not necessarily a bad thing, as the forced retirement of the Saturn V is now regarded as one of the worst U.S. space policy decisions ever… by a *lot* of people…

but…

1. As a result Griffin stood by silently or even aided and abetted as Bush-appointed climate-change deniers and creationists instituted their insane policies at Nasa, at *Nasa* of all places, on the behalf of the neocons and theocons.

2. Ares I and V have spiraled out of control. Under-powered and over-budget… to the point where the designers of the Orion crew capsule are having to cut out important safety advances just to fit the capsule on the Ares I.

And now Ares will eat just about all other new Nasa space science and space exploration budgets… and needs even more.

And as for why the drama in front of a notoriously no-drama Obama?

Well, there are some competing space architectures that may be able to pick up the threads where Griffin’s Ares fell down, and the proponents have naturally been pushing them… but since Griffin “went Bushie” the combination of pride and intolerance for other ideas has him lashing out at the thought… and he’s also lashing out at Obama, whom he fears will gut Nasa at the slightest excuse.

That would be silly thing for Obama to do, of course, and Obama promptly had his chain yanked up short by his advisers when he ventured that not-bright notion on the campaign trail.

But that seems to outline the plight Griffin is in.

Griffin: a man with a dream… who apparently wasn’t the right person for the job.


applepie | Thursday January 1, 2009 02:56 pm 17

The only reason he should stay on is if he decided to embark upon a very quick project to build a ship to fly him, his wife, the bush family, and the cheneys on a one way trip to Pluto (especially since Pluto is not a planet!)

Otherwise, … I’ll sign your petition for his removal.


billybugs | Thursday January 1, 2009 05:47 pm 18

How much does the director of NASA earn?

Sounds like wifey-poo doesn’t want to lose her gold cards!!


dilbertdogbert | Thursday January 1, 2009 06:38 pm 19

I would sign a petition to make the ISS the first museum in space.
Man in space is a waste of money.
Moon rocks, dust and some really neat photos are the only results of a vast expenditure of funds.
Lab coat welfare that we can’t afford anymore.
Near earth is where results can be achieved and those results don’t require soft pink bodies that mostly make a mess of their envionment.
Capt Chaos had it right: ”Better, Faster, Cheaper”. The good Capt was a butt head too.


MollyNYC | Thursday January 1, 2009 06:42 pm 20

From the story in the Sentinel

According to industry officials, Griffin started calling heads of companies working for NASA, demanding that they either tell the Obama team that they support Constellation or refrain from talking about alternatives. . . . One consultant said that when [transition team leader] Garver invited “several” midlevel aerospace executives to speak to the team, their bosses told them not to go and warned that anything said had to be cleared first with NASA because Griffin had demanded it.

Ah yes, the famous Bush appointee management style.

Obviously, after a stunt like that, Griffin is toast at NASA, no matter how many emails his wife sends–but you just know that once he’s out the door, he, the little woman and anyone still toadying to him will try to spin the reason for his dismissal as “partisan.”


zapkitty | Thursday January 1, 2009 09:58 pm 21

dilbertdogbert said

“Man in space is a waste of money.”

Ahh… the return of a classic false meme.

And this is why Griffin went to war… he, and others, fear the populist resurgence of a short-sighted mindset that echoes the false “Billions for space? Wasted! AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!” meme of decades and squandered opportunities past…

… a meme retooled for the 21st century as the original meme of “Space research is a waste!” turned out to be so wildly wrong…

… but even so a meme not based in any reality but on the politician’s perceived need to placate an “angry” public… with said same public “anger” being stirred up mostly by same-said politicians using any ignorant sound bites ready to hand.

(Look for a group of Blue Dogs to start up the mindless yipping very shortly.)

And as Griffin actually has been squandering money… not with a design decision that didn’t pan out, but with his refusal to change course afterward when it became evident that the “facts on the ground” demanded changes… I’d think Griffin would be feeling terribly vulnerable right now.

People in his organization and in the private contractors are working together designing better spacecraft on their own time, an incoming President whose first words re: NASA were the old mantra of “Gut it!”, and the current economic upheavals where NASA’s entire budget wouldn’t be a drop in the ocean but where NASA’s past status as “favored congressional whipping boy” makes them stand out.

Think of it as a variation on the “Democrats as battered-spouse” meme… with the battered-spouse taking it out on the family dog.

I think that’s where most of the institutional support for Ares in NASA comes from… “Oh god they’ll be coming after *everything* again if they find out we need to change Ares!”

The solution for NASA, I think, is to arrange it so that NASA has clear goals and rational oversight… but is no longer a prime target for congressional budget cherry-picking.

One thought has been 5-year budgets.

Might make sense, as designing and testing spacecraft is an iterative feedback process with the occasional “bang!” thrown in. Offsetting that process from the usual mad budget scramble, but still requiring oversight and congressional input, that could work…


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
Someone Tripped Up: So Far No Pics of Tripp 4 $ale
Drop-Outs? Palin’s Corresponding Spins

Close